Ethiopian vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 179,905,905 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Ethiopian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.403. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ethiopians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ethiopians corresponds to an increase of 16.5 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.8% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 29.1%), median female earnings ($43,243 compared to $38,738, a difference of 11.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,989 compared to $60,581, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,243 compared to $55,382, a difference of 1.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,824 compared to $95,070, a difference of 1.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,736 compared to $101,387, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (13.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 26.1%), single male poverty (11.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 19.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 0.90%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.54%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.92%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (69.3% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (82.0% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (43.2% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 12.5%), single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 10.3%), and currently married (44.5% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.1%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.13, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 33.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 23.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 12.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 21.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 49.7%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 31.2%), and professional degree (5.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.86%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.86%), and 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 32.9%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 32.6%), and male disability (10.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.45%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 8.0%).