Lithuanian vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,737,013 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Lithuanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.274. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lithuanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.099% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lithuanians corresponds to an increase of 99.1 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,448 compared to $43,806, a difference of 12.9%), median family income ($115,395 compared to $103,273, a difference of 11.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,484 compared to $101,387, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 1.9%), householder income under 25 years ($53,552 compared to $51,224, a difference of 4.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,209 compared to $60,581, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 11.9%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 11.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.5% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.2%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 4.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.98%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.91%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 0.69%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.74%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.0%), births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 8.4%), and single mother households (5.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.0% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 0.41%), married-couple households (48.9% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.68%), and average family size (3.10 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 12.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 8.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.67%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.2% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 27.9%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 26.1%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.17%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 9.2%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 3.3%).