Immigrants from South America vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 340,875,849 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Immigrant from South America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.475. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South America corresponds to a decrease of 2.6 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 14.5%), householder income under 25 years ($54,268 compared to $51,224, a difference of 5.9%), and median family income ($100,414 compared to $103,273, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($46,548 compared to $46,658, a difference of 0.24%), per capita income ($44,068 compared to $43,806, a difference of 0.60%), and median household income ($85,611 compared to $84,965, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 34.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 32.1%), and married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (17.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.3% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 15.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.9%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.51%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 25.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 13.2%), currently married (45.7% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 6.7%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.26%), births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 0.26%), and family households (65.6% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 43.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 36.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.2% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 19.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 30.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 51.2%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 10.1%), and master's degree (15.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.91%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.92%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 33.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 28.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.26%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.88%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.4%).