Latvian vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Latvian
Czechoslovakian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Latvians
Czechoslovakians
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Czechoslovakian Integration in Latvian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 185,691,327 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.892. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.383% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 382.6 Czechoslovakians.
Latvian vs Czechoslovakian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $43,806, a difference of 20.2%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $103,273, a difference of 16.5%), and median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $55,382, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 1.2%), householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $51,224, a difference of 3.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $60,581, a difference of 11.1%).
Income Metric | Latvian | Czechoslovakian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $52,649 | Average $43,806 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $120,301 | Average $103,273 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $97,311 | Average $84,965 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $53,001 | Average $46,658 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $63,498 | Good $55,382 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,941 | Poor $38,738 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Excellent $52,783 | Tragic $51,224 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $108,926 | Average $95,070 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $115,957 | Good $101,387 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $67,326 | Average $60,581 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.9% | Tragic 28.2% |
Latvian vs Czechoslovakian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.8% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 15.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 15.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.050%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.76%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 2.6%).
Poverty Metric | Latvian | Czechoslovakian |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Families | Exceptional 7.1% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Males | Exceptional 9.6% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 12.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.5% | Good 20.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.8% | Fair 13.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Good 16.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.2% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.5% | Excellent 15.5% |
Single Males | Good 12.7% | Tragic 13.4% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.0% | Fair 21.3% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Tragic 17.1% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.9% | Poor 29.7% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.1% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Latvian vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 10.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.26%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.82%).
Unemployment Metric | Latvian | Czechoslovakian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Average 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Excellent 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Excellent 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Excellent 8.6% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Fair 7.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Fair 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Latvian vs Czechoslovakian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.93%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Latvian | Czechoslovakian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.5% | Tragic 64.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Average 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.9% | Exceptional 41.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.1% | Exceptional 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.1% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.0% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.4% | Excellent 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.8% | Good 83.0% |
Latvian vs Czechoslovakian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.8%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 15.5%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.5% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 0.70%), average family size (3.11 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.72%), and married-couple households (47.9% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 1.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Latvian | Czechoslovakian |
Family Households | Tragic 62.8% | Excellent 64.6% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.4% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.9% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.11 | Tragic 3.13 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Average 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.5% | Exceptional 48.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Poor 12.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.7% | Fair 32.0% |
Latvian vs Czechoslovakian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 25.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 16.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 6.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 12.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Latvian | Czechoslovakian |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.8% | Exceptional 7.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.3% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.2% | Exceptional 59.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.3% | Exceptional 21.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.1% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Latvian vs Czechoslovakian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 48.4%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 43.8%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.060%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%).
Education Level Metric | Latvian | Czechoslovakian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.2% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Exceptional 95.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Exceptional 94.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 92.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Exceptional 90.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.2% | Exceptional 87.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 71.6% | Good 65.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.1% | Average 59.4% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 53.9% | Average 46.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 46.1% | Fair 37.0% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.8% | Fair 14.5% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.2% | Fair 4.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.6% | Fair 1.8% |
Latvian vs Czechoslovakian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 16.0%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 15.2%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.26%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.2%).
Disability Metric | Latvian | Czechoslovakian |
Disability | Excellent 11.4% | Tragic 12.5% |
Males | Good 11.1% | Tragic 12.3% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Poor 6.8% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.2% | Good 23.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.1% | Exceptional 46.6% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Fair 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.6% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 6.4% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Average 2.5% |