Immigrants from Eritrea vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,867,955 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Immigrant from Eritrea communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.183. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eritrea within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eritrea corresponds to an increase of 20.2 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 31.5%), median female earnings ($41,485 compared to $38,738, a difference of 7.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,373 compared to $101,387, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($85,025 compared to $84,965, a difference of 0.070%), median family income ($102,823 compared to $103,273, a difference of 0.44%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,574 compared to $51,224, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 35.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 24.9%), and family poverty (9.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 0.37%), single mother poverty (30.0% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 0.98%), and single female poverty (21.8% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 23.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.46%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (68.9% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.3% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 0.68%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.71%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (42.1% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 15.3%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.3%), and currently married (43.6% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.1%), births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 35.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 21.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 13.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 21.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 71.0%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 18.1%), and professional degree (4.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (66.1% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.46%), 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 31.6%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 29.1%), and male disability (10.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (23.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 8.1%).