Filipino vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,461,985 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Filipino communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.400. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Filipinos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.069% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Filipinos corresponds to an increase of 69.2 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Filipino and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($115,509 compared to $84,965, a difference of 35.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,723 compared to $95,070, a difference of 35.4%), and per capita income ($59,066 compared to $43,806, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.7% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 5.3%), householder income under 25 years ($57,740 compared to $51,224, a difference of 12.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($76,686 compared to $60,581, a difference of 26.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Filipino and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (11.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 44.7%), receiving food stamps (7.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 39.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.1% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 3.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Filipino and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 25.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 20.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.56%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Filipino and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.7% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 32.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.4% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Filipino and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.0% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 39.4%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 28.8%), and single mother households (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.7% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 1.9%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.13, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 32.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 2.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Filipino and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 91.8%), professional degree (7.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 79.7%), and master's degree (23.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 61.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (94.1% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.070%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.39%), and 10th grade (94.8% compared to 95.1%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 46.5%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 43.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.2%).