Immigrants from Chile vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,211,711 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.544. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.057% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 56.8 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 9.6%), per capita income ($46,213 compared to $43,806, a difference of 5.5%), and median female earnings ($40,353 compared to $38,738, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,954 compared to $55,382, a difference of 1.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,412 compared to $101,387, a difference of 2.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,159 compared to $95,070, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 23.9%), married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.1%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 20.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 10.0%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.76%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 20.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 6.3%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.9%), and currently married (46.4% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.11%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 40.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 17.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 10.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 15.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 34.3%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 25.2%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.61%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.61%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 26.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 21.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.23%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.0%).