Immigrants from El Salvador vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 259,412,849 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Immigrant from El Salvador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.124. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from El Salvador within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from El Salvador corresponds to a decrease of 0.9 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 23.7%), median male earnings ($47,973 compared to $55,382, a difference of 15.4%), and per capita income ($38,394 compared to $43,806, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($58,226 compared to $60,581, a difference of 4.1%), median household income ($81,213 compared to $84,965, a difference of 4.6%), and median female earnings ($36,673 compared to $38,738, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 55.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 38.8%), and family poverty (11.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.3% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 3.6%), single mother poverty (31.2% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and single female poverty (22.4% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 27.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 24.2%), and unemployment (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.3% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 22.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.71%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 29.5%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 26.9%), and births to unmarried women (36.4% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.0% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 3.7%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and married-couple households (44.3% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 33.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 8.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.92%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 139.1%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 23.7%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.3%), kindergarten (96.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and 1st grade (96.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 38.9%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 37.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.050%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 5.2%).