English vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,439,253 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within English communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.600. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in English within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.030% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 English corresponds to an increase of 30.4 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between English and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 4.5%), householder income over 65 years ($61,487 compared to $60,581, a difference of 1.5%), and median female earnings ($38,196 compared to $38,738, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($84,915 compared to $84,965, a difference of 0.060%), per capita income ($43,982 compared to $43,806, a difference of 0.40%), and median family income ($103,684 compared to $103,273, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between English and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 5.4%), single male poverty (14.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.24%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.28%), and poverty (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between English and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 6.6%), male unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.65%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between English and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.4% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.7% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.95%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.8% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.92%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.6% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.66%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between English and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.9%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and married-couple households (49.6% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.11 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.54%), family households (65.1% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.70%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between English and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 20.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.9% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between English and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 17.0%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 7.0%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.23%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between English and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 10.5%), hearing disability (3.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 6.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.35%), disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.42%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.99%).