Immigrants from Laos vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Laos
Czechoslovakian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Laos
Czechoslovakians
2,709
SOCIAL INDEX
24.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
242nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Czechoslovakian Integration in Immigrants from Laos Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,769,562 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.094. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to an increase of 3.3 Czechoslovakians.
Immigrants from Laos vs Czechoslovakian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 18.3%), per capita income ($37,857 compared to $43,806, a difference of 15.7%), and median male earnings ($49,190 compared to $55,382, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,041 compared to $51,224, a difference of 2.4%), median female earnings ($36,841 compared to $38,738, a difference of 5.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,722 compared to $60,581, a difference of 6.8%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Czechoslovakian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,857 | Average $43,806 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $92,239 | Average $103,273 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $78,327 | Average $84,965 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,884 | Average $46,658 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,190 | Good $55,382 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,841 | Poor $38,738 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,041 | Tragic $51,224 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $85,553 | Average $95,070 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $90,909 | Good $101,387 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,722 | Average $60,581 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.8% | Tragic 28.2% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Czechoslovakian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 33.9%), married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 30.7%), and family poverty (10.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 2.8%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 3.3%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Czechoslovakian |
Poverty | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Families | Tragic 10.2% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Males | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Females | Tragic 15.0% | Exceptional 12.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.6% | Good 20.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.2% | Fair 13.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.4% | Good 16.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.7% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.7% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.9% | Excellent 15.5% |
Single Males | Fair 13.0% | Tragic 13.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.9% | Fair 21.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.1% | Tragic 17.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.6% | Poor 29.7% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.1% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 11.5%), unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.3%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.29%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.64%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Czechoslovakian |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.1% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Average 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.5% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.7% | Excellent 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Fair 4.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Excellent 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.9% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Average 7.6% | Fair 7.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.2% | Fair 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Fair 5.5% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Czechoslovakian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.32%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Czechoslovakian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.0% | Tragic 64.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.4% | Average 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.6% | Exceptional 41.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.4% | Exceptional 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.8% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.2% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.8% | Excellent 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.6% | Good 83.0% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Czechoslovakian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 30.2%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 23.1%), and family households with children (29.8% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.95%), family households (65.3% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 6.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Czechoslovakian |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.3% | Excellent 64.6% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.8% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 45.1% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Tragic 3.13 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Average 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.0% | Exceptional 48.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.4% | Poor 12.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 34.0% | Fair 32.0% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Czechoslovakian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 8.3%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.53%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 3.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Czechoslovakian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 7.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.8% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.2% | Exceptional 59.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.4% | Exceptional 21.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Czechoslovakian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 94.2%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 30.2%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.7%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Czechoslovakian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.1% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.9% | Exceptional 95.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.5% | Exceptional 94.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.9% | Exceptional 92.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 86.6% | Exceptional 90.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.7% | Exceptional 87.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.3% | Good 65.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.7% | Average 59.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Average 46.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.6% | Fair 37.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Fair 14.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Fair 4.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Fair 1.8% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Czechoslovakian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 20.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 13.5%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.70%), disability (12.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.7%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Czechoslovakian |
Disability | Tragic 12.4% | Tragic 12.5% |
Males | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 12.3% |
Females | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 26.1% | Good 23.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.2% | Exceptional 46.6% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Fair 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Poor 6.3% | Tragic 6.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Average 2.5% |