Norwegian vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 361,069,600 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Norwegian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.575. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Norwegians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Norwegians corresponds to an increase of 13.4 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($53,127 compared to $51,224, a difference of 3.7%), median family income ($106,144 compared to $103,273, a difference of 2.8%), and wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,802 compared to $38,738, a difference of 0.17%), median earnings ($46,865 compared to $46,658, a difference of 0.44%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,104 compared to $60,581, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 17.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 16.3%), and family poverty (6.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (20.8% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 2.3%), single male poverty (12.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.4%), female unemployment (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 3.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.2% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 10.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (80.1% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.3% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 9.2%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 7.7%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.1%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (63.9% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 21.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 12.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.8% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 20.3%), college, under 1 year (68.4% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 3.9%), and college, 1 year or more (61.7% compared to 59.4%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.28%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.29%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 10.9%), ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 8.0%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.56%), male disability (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.89%), and disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.3%).