Kiowa vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Kiowa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Czechoslovakian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Kiowa

Czechoslovakians

Poor
Good
2,045
SOCIAL INDEX
18.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
274th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Czechoslovakian Integration in Kiowa Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,503,450 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Kiowa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.306. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Kiowa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Kiowa corresponds to a decrease of 6.0 Czechoslovakians.
Kiowa Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities

Kiowa vs Czechoslovakian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,815 compared to $101,387, a difference of 35.5%), median household income ($65,914 compared to $84,965, a difference of 28.9%), and median family income ($80,885 compared to $103,273, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,074 compared to $38,738, a difference of 13.7%), householder income under 25 years ($44,733 compared to $51,224, a difference of 14.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,140 compared to $60,581, a difference of 18.5%).
Kiowa vs Czechoslovakian Income
Income MetricKiowaCzechoslovakian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,102
Average
$43,806
Median Family Income
Tragic
$80,885
Average
$103,273
Median Household Income
Tragic
$65,914
Average
$84,965
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,232
Average
$46,658
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$45,094
Good
$55,382
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,074
Poor
$38,738
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,733
Tragic
$51,224
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$74,776
Average
$95,070
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$74,815
Good
$101,387
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$51,140
Average
$60,581
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.6%
Tragic
28.2%

Kiowa vs Czechoslovakian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (23.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 53.1%), family poverty (12.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 53.1%), and married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 52.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 13.1%), single mother poverty (35.5% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 19.2%), and single female poverty (26.9% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 26.3%).
Kiowa vs Czechoslovakian Poverty
Poverty MetricKiowaCzechoslovakian
Poverty
Tragic
16.8%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
8.0%
Males
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
12.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
29.2%
Good
20.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.7%
Fair
13.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
24.5%
Good
16.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
22.2%
Exceptional
15.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Exceptional
15.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
23.7%
Excellent
15.5%
Single Males
Tragic
18.3%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Tragic
26.9%
Fair
21.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.5%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
35.5%
Poor
29.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
9.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.3%
Exceptional
10.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
10.3%

Kiowa vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 53.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 34.6%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 4.3%).
Kiowa vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricKiowaCzechoslovakian
Unemployment
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
25.2%
Exceptional
16.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Poor
10.5%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Average
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.7%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Excellent
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.0%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.6%
Fair
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.1%

Kiowa vs Czechoslovakian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (79.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.4% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 5.8%).
Kiowa vs Czechoslovakian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricKiowaCzechoslovakian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.4%
Tragic
64.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.0%
Average
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.2%
Exceptional
41.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.2%
Exceptional
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.8%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.2%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.3%
Good
83.0%

Kiowa vs Czechoslovakian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (43.1% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 34.6%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 21.3%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.78%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.13, a difference of 4.6%), and family households (61.4% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 5.3%).
Kiowa vs Czechoslovakian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricKiowaCzechoslovakian
Family Households
Tragic
61.4%
Excellent
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.3%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.0%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.9%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Exceptional
48.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.5%
Poor
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
43.1%
Fair
32.0%

Kiowa vs Czechoslovakian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 47.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 14.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 11.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 11.3%).
Kiowa vs Czechoslovakian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricKiowaCzechoslovakian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.5%
Exceptional
7.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.6%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Exceptional
59.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Average
19.5%
Exceptional
21.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
7.1%

Kiowa vs Czechoslovakian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 36.5%), master's degree (10.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 34.0%), and bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.010%), 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.010%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.020%).
Kiowa vs Czechoslovakian Education Level
Education Level MetricKiowaCzechoslovakian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Good
93.9%
Exceptional
95.1%
11th Grade
Fair
92.2%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.0%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.2%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
87.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
57.8%
Good
65.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
51.0%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
36.5%
Average
46.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.8%
Fair
14.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.1%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Fair
1.8%

Kiowa vs Czechoslovakian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (17.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 47.2%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 47.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (32.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 41.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 2.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 8.4%), and cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 12.8%).
Kiowa vs Czechoslovakian Disability
Disability MetricKiowaCzechoslovakian
Disability
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
12.5%
Males
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.8%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
17.4%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.6%
Good
23.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
54.2%
Exceptional
46.6%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.3%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.7%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.6%
Tragic
6.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Average
2.5%