Immigrants from Kuwait vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 119,101,385 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Immigrant from Kuwait communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.907. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Kuwait within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.162% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Kuwait corresponds to an increase of 161.9 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kuwait and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($48,126 compared to $51,224, a difference of 6.4%), householder income over 65 years ($64,433 compared to $60,581, a difference of 6.4%), and per capita income ($46,543 compared to $43,806, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,122 compared to $95,070, a difference of 3.2%), median male earnings ($57,562 compared to $55,382, a difference of 3.9%), and median earnings ($48,861 compared to $46,658, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kuwait and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.0% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 15.2%), and male poverty (11.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (15.6% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 2.0%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.8% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kuwait and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 13.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 11.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kuwait and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 13.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.5% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kuwait and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.3%), births to unmarried women (28.8% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 11.4%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.7%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.13, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kuwait and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 19.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 15.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kuwait and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 42.7%), professional degree (5.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 36.5%), and master's degree (18.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.33%), ged/equivalency (87.7% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 0.33%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kuwait and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 28.4%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 23.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.31%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 8.9%).