Portuguese vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 322,527,172 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Portuguese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.075. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Portuguese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Portuguese corresponds to a decrease of 0.7 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($54,436 compared to $51,224, a difference of 6.3%), median household income ($88,976 compared to $84,965, a difference of 4.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,429 compared to $95,070, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($44,362 compared to $43,806, a difference of 1.3%), householder income over 65 years ($61,440 compared to $60,581, a difference of 1.4%), and median male earnings ($56,663 compared to $55,382, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 18.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.8% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 12.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (15.1% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.18%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.6% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 0.31%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.3% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 13.2%), unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.4%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.96%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 8.4%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.5%), and births to unmarried women (33.8% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.72%), married-couple households (47.8% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and family households (65.8% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 9.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.46%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.83%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 30.0%), bachelor's degree (35.5% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and associate's degree (44.1% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.52%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.52%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 6.9%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.0%), ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and disability (12.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.89%).