Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 173,153,863 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Immigrant from Ethiopia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.315. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ethiopia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ethiopia corresponds to a decrease of 6.9 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ethiopia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 30.7%), median female earnings ($42,744 compared to $38,738, a difference of 10.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,238 compared to $60,581, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,434 compared to $55,382, a difference of 0.090%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,256 compared to $95,070, a difference of 0.20%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,763 compared to $101,387, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ethiopia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (13.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 27.0%), single male poverty (11.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 17.1%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 1.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ethiopia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 12.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 12.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.74%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ethiopia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (69.4% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (82.1% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ethiopia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (43.1% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 12.8%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.4%), and currently married (44.5% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.13, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ethiopia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 33.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 24.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.0% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 12.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 21.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ethiopia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 51.4%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 31.4%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.92%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.92%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ethiopia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 36.7%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 32.8%), and male disability (10.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.44%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 7.8%).