Immigrants from Ireland vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 196,617,302 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Immigrant from Ireland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.186. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ireland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.024% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ireland corresponds to an increase of 23.8 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($56,584 compared to $43,806, a difference of 29.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($120,333 compared to $95,070, a difference of 26.6%), and median family income ($127,584 compared to $103,273, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.9% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 4.9%), householder income under 25 years ($57,075 compared to $51,224, a difference of 11.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($68,495 compared to $60,581, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 22.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 22.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (12.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.10%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 16.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 19.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 26.0%), births to unmarried women (27.2% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 17.8%), and single mother households (5.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.090%), currently married (48.4% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 0.80%), and married-couple households (48.0% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 75.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 31.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 6.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 15.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 25.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 49.7%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 41.7%), and master's degree (20.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (94.1% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.10%), 10th grade (95.0% compared to 95.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and 3rd grade (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 23.6%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 22.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 2.8%), disability age over 75 (44.7% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.6%).