Taiwanese vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 30,188,534 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Taiwanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.150. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Taiwanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.065% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Taiwanese corresponds to an increase of 65.3 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 12.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,492 compared to $95,070, a difference of 6.8%), and per capita income ($46,455 compared to $43,806, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,556 compared to $55,382, a difference of 0.31%), median earnings ($47,902 compared to $46,658, a difference of 2.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,180 compared to $101,387, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (10.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 22.9%), single father poverty (14.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 19.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 43.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 40.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.77%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 23.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.47%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 10.5%), divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 6.9%), and currently married (45.8% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (63.3% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 48.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 11.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 53.7%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 18.3%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (66.4% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.86%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.92%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 27.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 24.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 1.5%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 3.4%).