Turkish vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,352,258 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Turkish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.033. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Turks within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.024% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Turks corresponds to an increase of 24.1 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Turkish and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,391 compared to $43,806, a difference of 19.6%), median family income ($121,202 compared to $103,273, a difference of 17.4%), and median household income ($99,389 compared to $84,965, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 1.8%), householder income under 25 years ($54,266 compared to $51,224, a difference of 5.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($68,037 compared to $60,581, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Turkish and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.4% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 20.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 15.4%), and single female poverty (18.7% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.82%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and male poverty (10.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Turkish and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 9.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 9.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.75%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Turkish and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 18.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.61%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.68%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Turkish and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.5%), births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 16.7%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.13, a difference of 1.2%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 49.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 22.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 10.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 17.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Turkish and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 48.9%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 47.5%), and master's degree (19.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (94.0% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.040%), 10th grade (95.0% compared to 95.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 33.7%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 26.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.0%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 9.4%).