Mongolian vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 27,940,861 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Mongolian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.725. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mongolians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.132% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mongolians corresponds to an increase of 131.6 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,602 compared to $72,093, a difference of 54.8%), median family income ($114,553 compared to $76,188, a difference of 50.4%), and median household income ($93,971 compared to $62,575, a difference of 50.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,540 compared to $44,356, a difference of 18.4%), median male earnings ($60,350 compared to $50,547, a difference of 19.4%), and median earnings ($51,038 compared to $38,949, a difference of 31.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.2% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 92.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 77.5%), and single father poverty (15.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 75.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 21.2%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 27.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 32.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 81.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 48.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 12.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 11.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 0.94%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 66.8%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 42.3%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.61%), currently married (46.4% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 18.1%), no vehicles in household (13.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 14.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 187.9%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 176.8%), and master's degree (19.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 145.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.7% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.56%), 2nd grade (97.8% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.61%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 84.6%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 78.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 72.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 8.6%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 21.1%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 28.7%).