Burmese vs Houma Community Comparison
COMPARE
Burmese
Houma
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Burmese
Houma
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Houma Integration in Burmese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,006,103 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.337. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to an increase of 12.5 Houma.
Burmese vs Houma Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Houma communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $72,093, a difference of 68.5%), median household income ($103,145 compared to $62,575, a difference of 64.8%), and median family income ($123,369 compared to $76,188, a difference of 61.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $44,356, a difference of 23.5%), median male earnings ($65,236 compared to $50,547, a difference of 29.1%), and wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 38.0%).
Income Metric | Burmese | Houma |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $52,005 | Tragic $32,996 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $123,369 | Tragic $76,188 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $103,145 | Tragic $62,575 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $54,559 | Tragic $38,949 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $65,236 | Tragic $50,547 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $44,911 | Tragic $30,343 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,800 | Tragic $44,356 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $113,701 | Tragic $77,044 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $121,444 | Tragic $72,093 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $71,139 | Tragic $44,822 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.0% | Tragic 38.7% |
Burmese vs Houma Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Houma communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 103.4%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.0% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 102.1%), and single male poverty (11.7% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 100.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 38.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 39.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 46.1%).
Poverty Metric | Burmese | Houma |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 18.4% |
Families | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 14.6% |
Males | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 20.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.9% | Tragic 26.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 22.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.2% | Tragic 22.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Tragic 24.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.0% | Tragic 26.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.0% | Tragic 21.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 23.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.3% | Tragic 33.8% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.5% | Tragic 26.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.2% | Tragic 43.5% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 6.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 14.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 16.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 16.5% |
Burmese vs Houma Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 81.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 56.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Burmese | Houma |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.7% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 7.1% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.4% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.3% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 17.0% | Tragic 21.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.2% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 8.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.5% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.0% | Tragic 12.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.8% |
Burmese vs Houma Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 12.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 11.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 4.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Burmese | Houma |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.2% | Tragic 59.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.3% | Tragic 72.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.5% | Poor 35.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.6% | Tragic 73.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 81.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.3% | Tragic 79.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.6% | Tragic 74.1% |
Burmese vs Houma Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 76.6%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 49.9%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 43.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.7% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.050%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.080%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Burmese | Houma |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.7% | Exceptional 65.7% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.5% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.8% | Tragic 44.6% |
Average Family Size | Fair 3.22 | Tragic 3.18 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 7.9% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.9% | Tragic 45.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 13.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 26.4% | Tragic 46.6% |
Burmese vs Houma Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 38.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 28.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 6.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 18.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Burmese | Houma |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.7% | Tragic 11.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.4% | Tragic 88.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.8% | Poor 54.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.6% | Tragic 16.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.8% | Tragic 4.9% |
Burmese vs Houma Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 177.2%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 175.0%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 148.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.9% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.75%), 2nd grade (98.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.80%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.82%).
Education Level Metric | Burmese | Houma |
No Schooling Completed | Excellent 1.9% | Tragic 2.8% |
Nursery School | Excellent 98.1% | Tragic 97.3% |
Kindergarten | Excellent 98.1% | Tragic 97.3% |
1st Grade | Excellent 98.0% | Tragic 97.2% |
2nd Grade | Excellent 98.0% | Tragic 97.2% |
3rd Grade | Good 97.9% | Tragic 97.1% |
4th Grade | Excellent 97.7% | Tragic 96.8% |
5th Grade | Excellent 97.5% | Tragic 96.6% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.3% | Tragic 96.2% |
7th Grade | Excellent 96.3% | Tragic 95.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Tragic 94.2% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Tragic 92.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.5% | Tragic 90.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.6% | Tragic 87.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Tragic 83.7% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.8% | Tragic 81.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.3% | Tragic 75.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 71.9% | Tragic 47.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.7% | Tragic 41.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 54.6% | Tragic 28.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 46.9% | Tragic 21.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.7% | Tragic 7.9% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 2.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 0.96% |
Burmese vs Houma Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 102.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 89.5%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 86.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 15.6%), disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 22.3%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 32.2%).
Disability Metric | Burmese | Houma |
Disability | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 17.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 17.4% |
Females | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 16.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 9.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.0% | Tragic 9.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Tragic 18.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.6% | Tragic 32.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.9% | Tragic 56.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 3.4% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 19.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 9.3% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 3.0% |