Immigrants from Norway vs Houma Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Norway
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Houma
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Norway

Houma

Good
Tragic
7,420
SOCIAL INDEX
71.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
117th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Houma Integration in Immigrants from Norway Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 25,226,388 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Immigrant from Norway communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.911. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Norway within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.359% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Norway corresponds to an increase of 1,358.9 Houma.
Immigrants from Norway Integration in Houma Communities

Immigrants from Norway vs Houma Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Houma communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,217 compared to $32,996, a difference of 58.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,669 compared to $72,093, a difference of 54.9%), and median family income ($115,847 compared to $76,188, a difference of 52.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,984 compared to $44,356, a difference of 14.9%), median male earnings ($61,628 compared to $50,547, a difference of 21.9%), and median earnings ($51,758 compared to $38,949, a difference of 32.9%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Houma Income
Income MetricImmigrants from NorwayHouma
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,217
Tragic
$32,996
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$115,847
Tragic
$76,188
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$94,846
Tragic
$62,575
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$51,758
Tragic
$38,949
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,628
Tragic
$50,547
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,837
Tragic
$30,343
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,984
Tragic
$44,356
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$106,629
Tragic
$77,044
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,669
Tragic
$72,093
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,118
Tragic
$44,822
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Tragic
38.7%

Immigrants from Norway vs Houma Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Houma communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 80.7%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 80.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 78.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.4% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 22.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 34.4%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 38.9%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Houma Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from NorwayHouma
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
18.4%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
14.6%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Tragic
16.7%
Females
Excellent
12.8%
Tragic
20.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.4%
Tragic
26.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
22.7%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.3%
Tragic
22.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
24.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
26.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
21.5%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Tragic
23.5%
Single Females
Good
20.8%
Tragic
33.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.8%
Tragic
26.7%
Single Mothers
Average
29.3%
Tragic
43.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
6.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.5%
Tragic
14.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.1%
Tragic
16.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
16.5%

Immigrants from Norway vs Houma Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 70.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 45.1%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.5%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Houma Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from NorwayHouma
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.7%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
7.1%
Females
Good
5.2%
Tragic
6.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.5%
Tragic
21.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.1%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.8%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.5%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Excellent
7.4%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
12.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Tragic
6.8%

Immigrants from Norway vs Houma Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 11.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 0.89%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 4.2%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Houma Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from NorwayHouma
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.6%
Tragic
59.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.2%
Tragic
72.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.9%
Poor
35.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Tragic
73.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.6%
Tragic
81.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.1%
Tragic
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Fair
82.5%
Tragic
74.1%

Immigrants from Norway vs Houma Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.9% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 55.5%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 44.0%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.2%), currently married (47.2% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and married-couple households (46.5% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 4.1%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Houma Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from NorwayHouma
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.1%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.5%
Tragic
44.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.14
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.9%
Currently Married
Good
47.2%
Tragic
45.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
13.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.9%
Tragic
46.6%

Immigrants from Norway vs Houma Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 24.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 18.1%), and no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.23%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 0.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.060%), and no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.23%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Houma Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from NorwayHouma
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
11.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Tragic
88.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.4%
Poor
54.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
19.0%
Tragic
16.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.1%
Tragic
4.9%

Immigrants from Norway vs Houma Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 171.1%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 150.4%), and master's degree (18.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 137.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.0% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.89%), 2nd grade (98.1% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.95%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.97%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Houma Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from NorwayHouma
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
96.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
95.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Tragic
94.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Tragic
92.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Tragic
90.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Tragic
87.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
83.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.5%
Tragic
81.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.5%
Tragic
75.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.2%
Tragic
47.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.7%
Tragic
41.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
52.2%
Tragic
28.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.5%
Tragic
21.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.8%
Tragic
7.9%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
2.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
0.96%

Immigrants from Norway vs Houma Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 76.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 62.2%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 61.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 13.4%), disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 22.3%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 28.5%).
Immigrants from Norway vs Houma Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from NorwayHouma
Disability
Good
11.6%
Tragic
17.1%
Males
Average
11.3%
Tragic
17.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
16.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Tragic
1.9%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Average
5.6%
Tragic
9.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
9.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
18.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.8%
Tragic
32.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.9%
Tragic
56.2%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Tragic
3.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
9.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
3.0%