Uruguayan vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 27,776,211 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Uruguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.163. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Uruguayans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.021% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Uruguayans corresponds to an increase of 21.2 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Houma communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 53.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,660 compared to $72,093, a difference of 36.8%), and median household income ($84,691 compared to $62,575, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($53,680 compared to $50,547, a difference of 6.2%), householder income under 25 years ($52,465 compared to $44,356, a difference of 18.3%), and median earnings ($46,190 compared to $38,949, a difference of 18.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.9% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 96.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 70.4%), and single father poverty (15.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 68.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 18.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 20.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 21.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 63.1%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 39.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.41%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 12.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 10.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.1% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 40.6%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 23.0%), and single mother households (6.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.6% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 0.090%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.7%), and family households (64.5% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 14.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 10.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.16%), no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 108.9%), master's degree (15.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 92.8%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 84.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (95.4% compared to 95.1%, a difference of 0.31%), 5th grade (97.0% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.38%), and 3rd grade (97.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 82.6%), male disability (10.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 62.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 61.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 14.4%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 21.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 24.6%).