Czech vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,801,737 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.136. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 15.3 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Houma communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,507 compared to $72,093, a difference of 43.6%), median family income ($105,839 compared to $76,188, a difference of 38.9%), and median household income ($86,164 compared to $62,575, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,546 compared to $50,547, a difference of 11.9%), householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $44,356, a difference of 15.9%), and median earnings ($47,221 compared to $38,949, a difference of 21.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Houma communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 97.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.1% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 85.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.8% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 80.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 28.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 46.3%), and single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 50.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 89.0%), male unemployment (4.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 57.1%), and unemployment (4.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 53.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 22.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 13.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 52.5%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 40.4%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.0%), average family size (3.11 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.2%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Houma communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 66.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 49.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 5.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 13.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 40.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 97.3%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 97.0%), and no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 86.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 65.6%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 63.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 56.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 17.5%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 20.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 20.4%).