Romanian vs Houma Community Comparison
COMPARE
Romanian
Houma
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Romanians
Houma
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Houma Integration in Romanian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 33,239,369 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Romanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.567. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Romanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.042% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Romanians corresponds to an increase of 41.8 Houma.
Romanian vs Houma Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Romanian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,609 compared to $72,093, a difference of 50.6%), median household income ($91,994 compared to $62,575, a difference of 47.0%), and per capita income ($48,445 compared to $32,996, a difference of 46.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($60,063 compared to $50,547, a difference of 18.8%), householder income under 25 years ($53,632 compared to $44,356, a difference of 20.9%), and median earnings ($50,244 compared to $38,949, a difference of 29.0%).
Income Metric | Romanian | Houma |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $48,445 | Tragic $32,996 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $111,243 | Tragic $76,188 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $91,994 | Tragic $62,575 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $50,244 | Tragic $38,949 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $60,063 | Tragic $50,547 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,663 | Tragic $30,343 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,632 | Tragic $44,356 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $102,544 | Tragic $77,044 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $108,609 | Tragic $72,093 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,142 | Tragic $44,822 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.0% | Tragic 38.7% |
Romanian vs Houma Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Romanian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.5% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 87.8%), family poverty (8.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 79.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 77.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 31.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 37.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 40.4%).
Poverty Metric | Romanian | Houma |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 18.4% |
Families | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 14.6% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 20.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.0% | Tragic 26.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Tragic 22.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Tragic 22.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 24.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Tragic 26.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Tragic 21.5% |
Single Males | Excellent 12.5% | Tragic 23.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.6% | Tragic 33.8% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Tragic 26.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.8% | Tragic 43.5% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 14.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 16.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 16.5% |
Romanian vs Houma Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Romanian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 74.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 44.7%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Romanian | Houma |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.7% |
Males | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 7.1% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.4% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.3% | Tragic 21.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.2% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Tragic 8.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Excellent 4.7% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Poor 9.0% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 12.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 6.8% |
Romanian vs Houma Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Romanian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 12.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 9.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 5.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Romanian | Houma |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Fair 65.0% | Tragic 59.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.8% | Tragic 72.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.5% | Poor 35.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.5% | Tragic 73.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.8% | Tragic 81.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Good 84.8% | Tragic 79.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Good 84.5% | Tragic 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 83.0% | Tragic 74.1% |
Romanian vs Houma Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Romanian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 61.9%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 40.8%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.050%), family households (64.5% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Romanian | Houma |
Family Households | Good 64.5% | Exceptional 65.7% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 44.6% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Tragic 3.18 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 7.9% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 45.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 13.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.7% | Tragic 46.6% |
Romanian vs Houma Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 26.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 20.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.59%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 4.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Romanian | Houma |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 10.9% | Tragic 11.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Tragic 88.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Average 55.5% | Poor 54.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.3% | Tragic 16.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Tragic 4.9% |
Romanian vs Houma Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Romanian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 138.3%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 119.6%), and master's degree (17.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 117.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.97%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.0%).
Education Level Metric | Romanian | Houma |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 96.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Tragic 96.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 95.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Tragic 94.2% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Tragic 92.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.8% | Tragic 90.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.8% | Tragic 87.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Tragic 83.7% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.7% | Tragic 81.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.5% | Tragic 75.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.2% | Tragic 47.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.4% | Tragic 41.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.7% | Tragic 28.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 41.6% | Tragic 21.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.2% | Tragic 7.9% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 2.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 0.96% |
Romanian vs Houma Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 76.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 67.5%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 67.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 16.2%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 21.5%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 22.7%).
Disability Metric | Romanian | Houma |
Disability | Good 11.6% | Tragic 17.1% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Tragic 17.4% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 16.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 9.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.6% | Tragic 9.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 18.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.1% | Tragic 32.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Tragic 56.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 3.4% |
Hearing | Poor 3.1% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Tragic 19.3% |
Ambulatory | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 9.3% |
Self-Care | Good 2.4% | Tragic 3.0% |