Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Houma Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Houma
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Houma
4,141
SOCIAL INDEX
38.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
204th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Houma Integration in Immigrants from Uzbekistan Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 25,757,441 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Houma within Immigrant from Uzbekistan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.592. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uzbekistan within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.018% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uzbekistan corresponds to a decrease of 18.4 Houma.
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Houma Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Houma communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 69.9%), median female earnings ($43,363 compared to $30,343, a difference of 42.9%), and per capita income ($46,929 compared to $32,996, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($57,941 compared to $50,547, a difference of 14.6%), householder income under 25 years ($54,846 compared to $44,356, a difference of 23.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,331 compared to $44,822, a difference of 25.7%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Uzbekistan | Houma |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,929 | Tragic $32,996 |
Median Family Income | Average $103,197 | Tragic $76,188 |
Median Household Income | Good $86,425 | Tragic $62,575 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $50,151 | Tragic $38,949 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $57,941 | Tragic $50,547 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,363 | Tragic $30,343 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,846 | Tragic $44,356 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $98,849 | Tragic $77,044 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Average $100,523 | Tragic $72,093 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,331 | Tragic $44,822 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.7% | Tragic 38.7% |
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Houma Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.7% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 101.0%), single father poverty (15.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 78.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 75.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 1.9%), married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 5.0%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Uzbekistan | Houma |
Poverty | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 18.4% |
Families | Tragic 10.0% | Tragic 14.6% |
Males | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 20.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.2% | Tragic 26.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Excellent 12.9% | Tragic 22.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 17.0% | Tragic 22.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Poor 17.1% | Tragic 24.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Poor 17.3% | Tragic 26.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Fair 17.1% | Tragic 21.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 23.5% |
Single Females | Excellent 20.3% | Tragic 33.8% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.0% | Tragic 26.7% |
Single Mothers | Average 29.3% | Tragic 43.5% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 6.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 14.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.5% | Tragic 16.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 16.5% |
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Houma Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 59.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 56.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 48.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 5.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 5.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Uzbekistan | Houma |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.7% |
Males | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 7.1% |
Females | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 6.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 20.5% | Tragic 21.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 8.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 5.5% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 12.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Average 5.4% | Tragic 6.8% |
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Houma Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.2% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 22.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 11.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.4% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 5.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Uzbekistan | Houma |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.3% | Tragic 59.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 79.1% | Tragic 72.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 29.2% | Poor 35.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 70.4% | Tragic 73.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.9% | Tragic 81.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Average 84.7% | Tragic 79.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.2% | Tragic 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.3% | Tragic 74.1% |
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Houma Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.8% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 80.5%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 60.9%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.4% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 1.7%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.9%), and currently married (46.9% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 3.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Uzbekistan | Houma |
Family Households | Tragic 63.4% | Exceptional 65.7% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 45.4% | Tragic 44.6% |
Average Family Size | Good 3.24 | Tragic 3.18 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 7.9% |
Currently Married | Good 46.9% | Tragic 45.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 13.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 25.8% | Tragic 46.6% |
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Houma Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Houma communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (26.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 132.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (37.9% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 43.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (3.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (73.4% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 20.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (12.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 34.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (3.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 35.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Uzbekistan | Houma |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 26.7% | Tragic 11.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 73.4% | Tragic 88.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 37.9% | Poor 54.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 12.0% | Tragic 16.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 3.6% | Tragic 4.9% |
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Houma Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 133.6%), master's degree (17.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 125.7%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 106.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (95.1% compared to 95.1%, a difference of 0.010%), 3rd grade (97.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.060%), and 2nd grade (97.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.11%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Uzbekistan | Houma |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.8% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 97.3% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 97.3% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 97.2% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 97.2% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Tragic 97.1% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Tragic 96.8% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Tragic 96.6% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.3% | Tragic 96.2% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Tragic 95.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.8% | Tragic 94.2% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Tragic 92.3% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.6% | Tragic 90.2% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.5% | Tragic 87.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.1% | Tragic 83.7% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.8% | Tragic 81.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.6% | Tragic 75.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 65.8% | Tragic 47.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Excellent 61.0% | Tragic 41.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 50.3% | Tragic 28.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.8% | Tragic 21.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.9% | Tragic 7.9% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 2.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Excellent 2.0% | Tragic 0.96% |
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Houma Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.85% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 119.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 90.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 85.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 3.2%), disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 14.2%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 15.7%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Uzbekistan | Houma |
Disability | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 17.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 17.4% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Tragic 16.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.85% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 9.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.5% | Tragic 9.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 18.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 22.8% | Tragic 32.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.2% | Tragic 56.2% |
Vision | Good 2.1% | Tragic 3.4% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 19.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 9.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 3.0% |