Immigrants from Malaysia vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,911,564 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Immigrant from Malaysia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.933. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Malaysia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.036% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Malaysia corresponds to an increase of 1,036.4 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Houma communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,796 compared to $72,093, a difference of 56.5%), median household income ($96,292 compared to $62,575, a difference of 53.9%), and median family income ($115,880 compared to $76,188, a difference of 52.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,179 compared to $44,356, a difference of 22.2%), median male earnings ($62,121 compared to $50,547, a difference of 22.9%), and median earnings ($52,514 compared to $38,949, a difference of 34.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.0% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 95.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 83.3%), and single father poverty (15.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 75.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 24.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 27.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 31.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 80.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 52.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 47.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.63%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 12.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 11.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 0.45%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.3% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 70.2%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 42.8%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (64.0% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 20.2%), no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 18.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Houma communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 167.5%), professional degree (5.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 157.7%), and master's degree (18.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 139.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.32%), 2nd grade (97.6% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.38%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 91.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 82.7%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 78.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 12.6%), disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 21.0%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 30.2%).