Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Houma Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Houma
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar

Houma

Fair
Tragic
3,365
SOCIAL INDEX
31.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
222nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Houma Integration in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,573,441 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Houma within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.012. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to an increase of 0.3 Houma.
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Integration in Houma Communities

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Houma Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Houma communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 69.2%), householder income over 65 years ($57,114 compared to $44,822, a difference of 27.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,385 compared to $72,093, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,298 compared to $50,547, a difference of 0.50%), householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $44,356, a difference of 9.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($86,736 compared to $77,044, a difference of 12.6%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Houma Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarHouma
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,827
Tragic
$32,996
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,472
Tragic
$76,188
Median Household Income
Tragic
$78,682
Tragic
$62,575
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,998
Tragic
$38,949
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,298
Tragic
$50,547
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,028
Tragic
$30,343
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,749
Tragic
$44,356
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$86,736
Tragic
$77,044
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,385
Tragic
$72,093
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$57,114
Tragic
$44,822
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.8%
Tragic
38.7%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Houma Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.1% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 78.7%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 62.4%), and single female poverty (22.6% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 49.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 5.9%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 9.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (20.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 11.6%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Houma Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarHouma
Poverty
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
18.4%
Families
Tragic
10.5%
Tragic
14.6%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
16.7%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
20.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
26.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
22.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
22.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Tragic
24.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Tragic
26.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Tragic
21.5%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Tragic
23.5%
Single Females
Tragic
22.6%
Tragic
33.8%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Tragic
26.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.6%
Tragic
43.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
6.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.3%
Tragic
14.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.1%
Tragic
16.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
16.5%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Houma Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 70.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 65.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 18.1%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Houma Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarHouma
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.7%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
7.1%
Females
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Tragic
21.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.5%
Tragic
12.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Tragic
6.8%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Houma Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 11.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 10.7%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 5.7%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Houma Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarHouma
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.3%
Tragic
59.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Tragic
72.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.0%
Poor
35.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.3%
Tragic
73.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Tragic
81.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Tragic
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Tragic
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.0%
Tragic
74.1%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Houma Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 41.6%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 20.5%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.8%), currently married (44.3% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and married-couple households (43.4% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 2.8%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Houma Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarHouma
Family Households
Tragic
62.6%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.4%
Tragic
44.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.9%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.3%
Tragic
45.5%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Tragic
13.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
32.9%
Tragic
46.6%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Houma Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 27.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 17.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 0.91%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 10.0%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Houma Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarHouma
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Tragic
11.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.7%
Tragic
88.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Poor
54.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.8%
Tragic
16.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
4.9%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Houma Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Houma communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 78.8%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 78.1%), and master's degree (13.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 70.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (94.1% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.11%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.41%), and kindergarten (96.8% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.44%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Houma Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarHouma
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.8%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Tragic
97.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.8%
Tragic
97.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Tragic
97.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Tragic
97.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Tragic
97.1%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Tragic
96.8%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Tragic
96.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Tragic
96.2%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Tragic
95.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Tragic
94.2%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Tragic
92.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Tragic
90.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.4%
Tragic
87.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.9%
Tragic
83.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.7%
Tragic
81.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.0%
Tragic
75.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.5%
Tragic
47.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.6%
Tragic
41.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.7%
Tragic
28.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.5%
Tragic
21.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
7.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Tragic
2.2%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Tragic
0.96%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Houma Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 65.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 62.5%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 57.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 5.7%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 17.3%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 21.2%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Houma Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarHouma
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Tragic
17.1%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
17.4%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Tragic
16.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.9%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Average
5.6%
Tragic
9.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Tragic
9.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
18.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.0%
Tragic
32.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.9%
Tragic
56.2%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
3.4%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Tragic
9.3%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Tragic
3.0%