Scotch-Irish vs Houma Community Comparison

COMPARE

Scotch-Irish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Houma
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Scotch-Irish

Houma

Average
Tragic
5,433
SOCIAL INDEX
51.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
176th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Houma Integration in Scotch-Irish Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,472,606 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Scotch-Irish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.540. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scotch-Irish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.515% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scotch-Irish corresponds to an increase of 514.6 Houma.
Scotch-Irish Integration in Houma Communities

Scotch-Irish vs Houma Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Houma communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 35.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,073 compared to $72,093, a difference of 34.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,447 compared to $44,822, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($53,658 compared to $50,547, a difference of 6.1%), householder income under 25 years ($49,039 compared to $44,356, a difference of 10.6%), and median earnings ($44,924 compared to $38,949, a difference of 15.3%).
Scotch-Irish vs Houma Income
Income MetricScotch-IrishHouma
Per Capita Income
Fair
$42,563
Tragic
$32,996
Median Family Income
Poor
$99,591
Tragic
$76,188
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,972
Tragic
$62,575
Median Earnings
Poor
$44,924
Tragic
$38,949
Median Male Earnings
Fair
$53,658
Tragic
$50,547
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,383
Tragic
$30,343
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,039
Tragic
$44,356
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$89,969
Tragic
$77,044
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$97,073
Tragic
$72,093
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Poor
$59,447
Tragic
$44,822
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.5%
Tragic
38.7%

Scotch-Irish vs Houma Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Houma communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 70.8%), single male poverty (14.7% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 59.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.5% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 59.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 21.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (18.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 24.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 28.9%).
Scotch-Irish vs Houma Poverty
Poverty MetricScotch-IrishHouma
Poverty
Good
12.2%
Tragic
18.4%
Families
Excellent
8.6%
Tragic
14.6%
Males
Good
11.0%
Tragic
16.7%
Females
Good
13.3%
Tragic
20.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
26.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
22.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.2%
Tragic
22.7%
Children Under 16 years
Average
16.3%
Tragic
24.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.5%
Tragic
26.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
16.7%
Tragic
21.5%
Single Males
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
23.5%
Single Females
Tragic
22.9%
Tragic
33.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.6%
Tragic
26.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.5%
Tragic
43.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
6.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
14.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
16.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
16.5%

Scotch-Irish vs Houma Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 71.2%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 45.0%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 9.3%).
Scotch-Irish vs Houma Unemployment
Unemployment MetricScotch-IrishHouma
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.7%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
7.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
21.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.4%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
12.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
6.8%

Scotch-Irish vs Houma Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 16.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 10.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.3% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 4.9%).
Scotch-Irish vs Houma Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricScotch-IrishHouma
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.3%
Tragic
59.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.3%
Tragic
72.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.5%
Poor
35.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.0%
Tragic
73.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Tragic
81.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Tragic
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.6%
Tragic
74.1%

Scotch-Irish vs Houma Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 40.0%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 31.1%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.1%), average family size (3.11 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.4%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 5.4%).
Scotch-Irish vs Houma Family Structure
Family Structure MetricScotch-IrishHouma
Family Households
Average
64.4%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.3%
Tragic
44.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
7.9%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.7%
Tragic
45.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
13.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Tragic
46.6%

Scotch-Irish vs Houma Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Houma communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 68.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 50.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 5.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.9% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 12.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 40.7%).
Scotch-Irish vs Houma Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricScotch-IrishHouma
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
11.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.3%
Tragic
88.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
60.9%
Poor
54.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.6%
Tragic
16.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
4.9%

Scotch-Irish vs Houma Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Houma communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 95.8%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 94.1%), and no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 92.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.4%).
Scotch-Irish vs Houma Education Level
Education Level MetricScotch-IrishHouma
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Tragic
2.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
97.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
97.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
97.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
95.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
94.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
92.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.2%
Tragic
90.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Tragic
87.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.4%
Tragic
83.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Tragic
81.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.8%
Tragic
75.0%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.4%
Tragic
47.6%
College, 1 year or more
Fair
58.9%
Tragic
41.2%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.3%
Tragic
28.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Poor
36.4%
Tragic
21.4%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.4%
Tragic
7.9%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.3%
Tragic
2.2%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Tragic
0.96%

Scotch-Irish vs Houma Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 44.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 43.0%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 9.2%), hearing disability (3.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 10.5%), and cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 13.0%).
Scotch-Irish vs Houma Disability
Disability MetricScotch-IrishHouma
Disability
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
17.1%
Males
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
17.4%
Females
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
16.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Tragic
1.9%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
9.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Tragic
9.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
18.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.4%
Tragic
32.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.3%
Tragic
56.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
3.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.8%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.1%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
9.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
3.0%