French vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,782,238 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within French communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.571. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.107% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French corresponds to an increase of 107.1 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French and Houma communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,824 compared to $72,093, a difference of 38.5%), wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 34.7%), and median family income ($102,368 compared to $76,188, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,350 compared to $50,547, a difference of 9.5%), householder income under 25 years ($51,230 compared to $44,356, a difference of 15.5%), and median earnings ($46,296 compared to $38,949, a difference of 18.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French and Houma communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 77.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.8% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 65.5%), and single male poverty (14.4% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 62.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 26.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 29.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 34.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 67.8%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 40.9%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 38.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.1% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 18.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 11.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 39.2%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 32.1%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.10 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.6%), family households (64.0% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and currently married (48.4% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French and Houma communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 54.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 41.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 4.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 9.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 33.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 91.6%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 91.5%), and no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 87.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.3%), 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3rd grade (98.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.7% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 47.4%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 46.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 10.4%), hearing disability (3.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 12.8%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 13.3%).