Bangladeshi vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 26,077,129 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Bangladeshi communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.700. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bangladeshis within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.141% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bangladeshis corresponds to an increase of 140.9 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Houma communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.2% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 74.4%), householder income over 65 years ($54,719 compared to $44,822, a difference of 22.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,402 compared to $72,093, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,363 compared to $77,044, a difference of 5.6%), median earnings ($41,263 compared to $38,949, a difference of 5.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,589 compared to $44,356, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 76.1%), single male poverty (13.3% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 75.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 42.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.1%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 7.4%), and receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 69.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 64.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 5.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.5% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 19.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 10.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 35.3%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 10.7%), and average family size (3.37 compared to 3.18, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.3%), married-couple households (43.5% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and single mother households (8.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 53.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 36.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 7.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 32.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Houma communities in the United States are seen in associate's degree (40.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 41.9%), bachelor's degree (30.2% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 40.9%), and professional degree (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (94.3% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.030%), 6th grade (95.7% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.62%), and 7th grade (94.5% compared to 95.1%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 56.0%), ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 48.6%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 46.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 3.5%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and disability age over 75 (49.4% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 13.6%).