Immigrants from Moldova vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 25,750,565 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Houma within Immigrant from Moldova communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.317. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Moldova within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.068% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Moldova corresponds to a decrease of 68.4 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Houma communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($107,357 compared to $72,093, a difference of 48.9%), wage/income gap (26.2% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 47.6%), and median household income ($91,446 compared to $62,575, a difference of 46.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($59,417 compared to $50,547, a difference of 17.5%), householder income under 25 years ($56,168 compared to $44,356, a difference of 26.6%), and median earnings ($50,274 compared to $38,949, a difference of 29.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.2% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 110.1%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 89.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 87.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 36.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 36.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 41.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 78.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 48.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 13.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 11.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.3% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 70.6%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 40.4%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.070%), family households (64.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 21.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 18.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 16.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 119.8%), master's degree (16.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 110.0%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 103.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.9% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.74%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.77%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 76.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 73.7%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 68.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 15.3%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 16.6%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 18.3%).