Immigrants from Australia vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 30,270,296 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Immigrant from Australia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.722. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Australia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.043% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Australia corresponds to an increase of 43.5 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Houma communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,953 compared to $32,996, a difference of 75.6%), median family income ($126,620 compared to $76,188, a difference of 66.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($119,308 compared to $72,093, a difference of 65.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,660 compared to $44,356, a difference of 27.7%), median male earnings ($67,634 compared to $50,547, a difference of 33.8%), and wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 37.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Houma communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 93.1%), single male poverty (12.2% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 92.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 90.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 25.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 32.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 40.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 76.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 49.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 11.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 10.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.6% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 74.9%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 55.7%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 47.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.7%), currently married (47.3% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and married-couple households (46.5% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Houma communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 20.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 18.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.4% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 211.5%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 192.4%), and master's degree (20.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 163.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.0%), 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 93.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 80.5%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 76.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 12.4%), disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 23.5%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 31.7%).