Argentinean vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,752,412 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Argentinean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.453. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Argentineans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.166% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Argentineans corresponds to an increase of 165.8 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Houma communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,103 compared to $72,093, a difference of 52.7%), per capita income ($49,862 compared to $32,996, a difference of 51.1%), and median household income ($93,960 compared to $62,575, a difference of 50.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($60,117 compared to $50,547, a difference of 18.9%), householder income under 25 years ($54,154 compared to $44,356, a difference of 22.1%), and median earnings ($50,399 compared to $38,949, a difference of 29.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.9% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 96.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 81.8%), and single female poverty (19.1% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 76.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 21.0%), married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 25.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 25.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 77.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 44.4%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 12.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 10.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 0.81%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 55.3%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 36.2%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.5%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 25.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 17.9%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.5% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 0.12%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 167.4%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 138.2%), and master's degree (18.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 129.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.7% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.61%), 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.68%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 99.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 78.0%), and male disability (10.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 72.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 16.1%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 21.6%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 29.7%).