Immigrants from Asia vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,512,594 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Houma within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.265. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to a decrease of 2.9 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Houma communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,566 compared to $72,093, a difference of 61.7%), median household income ($99,933 compared to $62,575, a difference of 59.7%), and median family income ($118,291 compared to $76,188, a difference of 55.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($63,240 compared to $50,547, a difference of 25.1%), householder income under 25 years ($56,379 compared to $44,356, a difference of 27.1%), and median earnings ($53,310 compared to $38,949, a difference of 36.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.4% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 106.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.6% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 95.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.9% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 88.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 31.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 33.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 39.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 76.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 54.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 11.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 73.8%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 41.5%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 40.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.52%), family households with children (28.8% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 38.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 26.0%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.70%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Houma communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 153.2%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 148.4%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 132.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.23%), 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.30%), and 5th grade (96.9% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 97.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 86.7%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 79.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 14.7%), disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 19.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 26.2%).