Ugandan vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,946,667 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Ugandan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.800. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ugandans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.875% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ugandans corresponds to an increase of 2,875.0 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Houma communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.1% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 60.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,472 compared to $72,093, a difference of 43.5%), and median household income ($87,557 compared to $62,575, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,290 compared to $50,547, a difference of 9.4%), householder income under 25 years ($50,923 compared to $44,356, a difference of 14.8%), and median earnings ($47,854 compared to $38,949, a difference of 22.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.3% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 90.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 70.0%), and single father poverty (16.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 64.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.1% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 18.6%), married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 19.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (17.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 24.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 63.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 45.8%), and male unemployment (5.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 13.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 13.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.9% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.1% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 54.7%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 26.1%), and single mother households (6.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.7%), married-couple households (43.8% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and currently married (44.2% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 16.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 10.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.25%), no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.36%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Houma communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 132.3%), professional degree (5.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 130.8%), and master's degree (17.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 116.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.8% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.66%), 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.71%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Houma communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 65.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 65.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 64.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 5.0%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 21.3%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 27.7%).