Celtic vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,093,986 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Celtic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.200. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Celtics within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.042% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Celtics corresponds to an increase of 41.8 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Celtic and Houma communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 41.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,896 compared to $72,093, a difference of 37.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,608 compared to $44,822, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($54,242 compared to $50,547, a difference of 7.3%), householder income under 25 years ($50,447 compared to $44,356, a difference of 13.7%), and median earnings ($45,732 compared to $38,949, a difference of 17.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Celtic and Houma communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 65.6%), single male poverty (14.5% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 62.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.6% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 57.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 21.2%), child poverty among girls under 16 (17.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 26.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 26.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Celtic and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 68.6%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 42.2%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Celtic and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 16.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 10.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Celtic and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 39.8%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 29.2%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.11 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.1%), family households (63.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 44.3%), no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 42.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 8.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 34.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Celtic and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 98.1%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 96.8%), and master's degree (14.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 86.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 45.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 44.1%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 11.5%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 12.3%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 13.7%).