Cambodian vs Houma Community Comparison
COMPARE
Cambodian
Houma
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Cambodians
Houma
9,346
SOCIAL INDEX
90.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
19th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Houma Integration in Cambodian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,697,271 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Cambodian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cambodians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.215% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cambodians corresponds to an increase of 215.2 Houma.
Cambodian vs Houma Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,342 compared to $72,093, a difference of 58.6%), per capita income ($51,731 compared to $32,996, a difference of 56.8%), and median family income ($117,780 compared to $76,188, a difference of 54.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($62,516 compared to $50,547, a difference of 23.7%), householder income under 25 years ($55,571 compared to $44,356, a difference of 25.3%), and median earnings ($53,386 compared to $38,949, a difference of 37.1%).
Income Metric | Cambodian | Houma |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $51,731 | Tragic $32,996 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $117,780 | Tragic $76,188 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $96,324 | Tragic $62,575 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $53,386 | Tragic $38,949 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $62,516 | Tragic $50,547 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $45,014 | Tragic $30,343 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $55,571 | Tragic $44,356 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $107,148 | Tragic $77,044 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $114,342 | Tragic $72,093 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $66,892 | Tragic $44,822 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.8% | Tragic 38.7% |
Cambodian vs Houma Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.8% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 99.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 94.3%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 86.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 34.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 35.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 41.2%).
Poverty Metric | Cambodian | Houma |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 18.4% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 14.6% |
Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 20.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.4% | Tragic 26.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 22.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Tragic 22.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Tragic 24.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 26.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Tragic 21.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 23.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.2% | Tragic 33.8% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.4% | Tragic 26.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.0% | Tragic 43.5% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 6.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.4% | Tragic 14.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Tragic 16.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 16.5% |
Cambodian vs Houma Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 78.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 65.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 59.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 15.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Cambodian | Houma |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.7% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 7.1% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.9% | Tragic 21.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 8.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.6% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.5% | Tragic 12.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.8% |
Cambodian vs Houma Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 13.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 13.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.1% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.0% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 5.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Cambodian | Houma |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.4% | Tragic 59.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 81.1% | Tragic 72.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Good 37.0% | Poor 35.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.2% | Tragic 73.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.0% | Tragic 81.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.2% | Tragic 79.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.3% | Tragic 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Tragic 74.1% |
Cambodian vs Houma Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.7% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 74.5%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 49.9%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 48.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.81%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 3.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Cambodian | Houma |
Family Households | Tragic 61.4% | Exceptional 65.7% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.5% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 44.6% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.15 | Tragic 3.18 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 7.9% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Tragic 45.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 13.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 26.7% | Tragic 46.6% |
Cambodian vs Houma Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 10.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.61%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.3% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Cambodian | Houma |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 10.9% | Tragic 11.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Tragic 88.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.3% | Poor 54.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.8% | Tragic 16.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 4.9% |
Cambodian vs Houma Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 169.2%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 168.0%), and master's degree (20.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 152.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.9% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.81%), 2nd grade (98.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.87%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.89%).
Education Level Metric | Cambodian | Houma |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 2.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.2% |
3rd Grade | Excellent 97.9% | Tragic 97.1% |
4th Grade | Excellent 97.7% | Tragic 96.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Tragic 96.2% |
7th Grade | Excellent 96.3% | Tragic 95.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Tragic 94.2% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Tragic 92.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.5% | Tragic 90.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.6% | Tragic 87.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Tragic 83.7% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.8% | Tragic 81.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.2% | Tragic 75.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 71.9% | Tragic 47.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.7% | Tragic 41.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 54.6% | Tragic 28.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 47.2% | Tragic 21.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 20.0% | Tragic 7.9% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.0% | Tragic 2.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 0.96% |
Cambodian vs Houma Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 90.5%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 76.0%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 72.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 11.0%), disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 21.8%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 33.7%).
Disability Metric | Cambodian | Houma |
Disability | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 17.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 17.4% |
Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 16.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 9.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 9.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 18.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.8% | Tragic 32.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.1% | Tragic 56.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 3.4% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Fair 17.3% | Tragic 19.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 9.3% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 3.0% |