Native Hawaiian vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 33,327,861 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.478. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to an increase of 12.4 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $44,822, a difference of 58.5%), wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 52.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,149 compared to $72,093, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($52,306 compared to $50,547, a difference of 3.5%), median earnings ($45,027 compared to $38,949, a difference of 15.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,058 compared to $77,044, a difference of 23.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.6% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 85.9%), family poverty (8.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 75.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 72.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 28.3%), married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 37.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 38.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 57.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 46.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 8.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 35.7%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 29.5%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 4.0%), family households (68.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and currently married (47.9% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 91.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 55.3%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 49.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 12.8%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 49.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 76.0%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 71.6%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 65.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.2%), 2nd grade (98.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 73.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 60.2%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 57.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 14.8%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 15.3%), and disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 16.2%).