Swiss vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,778,330 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Swiss communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.806. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swiss within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.046% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swiss corresponds to an increase of 46.3 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Swiss and Houma communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,071 compared to $72,093, a difference of 43.0%), householder income over 65 years ($61,621 compared to $44,822, a difference of 37.5%), and median family income ($104,396 compared to $76,188, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,731 compared to $50,547, a difference of 10.3%), householder income under 25 years ($51,493 compared to $44,356, a difference of 16.1%), and median earnings ($46,315 compared to $38,949, a difference of 18.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swiss and Houma communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 89.4%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.8% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 77.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 71.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 29.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 40.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 45.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swiss and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 79.9%), male unemployment (4.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 51.0%), and unemployment (4.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 47.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swiss and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.3% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 21.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 11.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.7% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swiss and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 52.7%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 40.8%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.76%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.90%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 57.9%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 46.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 43.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 12.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 43.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swiss and Houma communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 105.9%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 102.0%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 86.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 61.1%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 59.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 56.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 14.4%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 15.5%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 19.5%).