Laotian vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 30,602,459 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Houma within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.177. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.044% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to a decrease of 43.9 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,051 compared to $72,093, a difference of 54.0%), median household income ($94,990 compared to $62,575, a difference of 51.8%), and median family income ($112,859 compared to $76,188, a difference of 48.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($59,351 compared to $50,547, a difference of 17.4%), householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $44,356, a difference of 22.6%), and median earnings ($50,343 compared to $38,949, a difference of 29.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.9% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 97.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 86.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 83.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 32.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 35.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 36.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 71.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 57.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 11.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 10.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 0.64%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 63.5%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 36.0%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.090%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 50.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 33.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 7.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 26.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 140.8%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 136.6%), and master's degree (17.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 115.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.6% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.44%), 2nd grade (97.7% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.51%), and 5th grade (97.1% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 84.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 77.1%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 72.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 11.5%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 17.3%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 24.0%).