Filipino vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,062,792 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Filipino communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.170. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Filipinos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Filipinos corresponds to an increase of 8.8 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Filipino and Houma communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($134,910 compared to $72,093, a difference of 87.1%), median household income ($115,509 compared to $62,575, a difference of 84.6%), and median family income ($138,397 compared to $76,188, a difference of 81.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.7% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 30.1%), householder income under 25 years ($57,740 compared to $44,356, a difference of 30.2%), and median male earnings ($74,224 compared to $50,547, a difference of 46.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Filipino and Houma communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (11.1% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 135.8%), child poverty under the age of 16 (11.1% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 123.2%), and receiving food stamps (7.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 122.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 37.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 42.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 51.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Filipino and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 93.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 64.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 53.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Filipino and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 12.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (31.7% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 12.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (71.4% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Filipino and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 102.6%), single mother households (4.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 68.8%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 62.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.10%), family households (65.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.29%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 40.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 29.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 6.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Filipino and Houma communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.4% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 258.5%), professional degree (7.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 241.2%), and master's degree (23.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 195.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.9% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.76%), 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.80%), and 2nd grade (98.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.0% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 132.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 108.8%), and vision disability (1.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 104.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 17.5%), disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 23.6%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 38.5%).