French American Indian vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 27,611,784 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Houma within French American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.335. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French American Indians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.217% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French American Indians corresponds to a decrease of 217.1 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 52.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($89,811 compared to $72,093, a difference of 24.6%), and median household income ($76,387 compared to $62,575, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,611 compared to $50,547, a difference of 0.13%), householder income under 25 years ($48,977 compared to $44,356, a difference of 10.4%), and median earnings ($43,333 compared to $38,949, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (15.0% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 56.7%), single father poverty (17.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 53.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 43.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (20.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 9.0%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 11.8%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 16.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 42.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 34.2%), and male unemployment (5.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 11.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 9.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.6% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 27.2%), single mother households (6.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 15.3%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.53%), currently married (45.0% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and married-couple households (44.1% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 38.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 25.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 69.6%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 64.7%), and master's degree (12.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 60.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.8% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.67%), 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.74%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 40.8%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 39.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 38.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 7.7%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 10.0%), and disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 16.2%).