Asian vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,734,691 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Houma within Asian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.177. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Asians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Asians corresponds to a decrease of 1.5 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Asian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,426 compared to $72,093, a difference of 64.3%), median household income ($101,681 compared to $62,575, a difference of 62.5%), and median family income ($119,955 compared to $76,188, a difference of 57.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($63,827 compared to $50,547, a difference of 26.3%), householder income under 25 years ($57,003 compared to $44,356, a difference of 28.5%), and median earnings ($53,690 compared to $38,949, a difference of 37.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Asian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.2% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 109.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 99.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.5% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 93.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 35.3%), married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 36.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 41.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Asian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 78.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 56.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.49%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Asian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 12.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 11.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Asian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 73.8%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 41.8%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 39.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.2%), family households with children (29.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and average family size (3.28 compared to 3.18, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Asian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 42.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 29.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 4.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 27.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Asian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 153.5%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 148.6%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 133.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.26%), 5th grade (96.9% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.33%), and 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Asian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 99.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 88.4%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 81.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 15.0%), disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 19.6%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 28.4%).