Immigrants from Uganda vs Houma Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Uganda
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Houma
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Uganda

Houma

Good
Tragic
6,298
SOCIAL INDEX
60.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
157th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Houma Integration in Immigrants from Uganda Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 27,579,209 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Immigrant from Uganda communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.272. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uganda within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.977% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uganda corresponds to an increase of 976.9 Houma.
Immigrants from Uganda Integration in Houma Communities

Immigrants from Uganda vs Houma Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Houma communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 55.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,584 compared to $72,093, a difference of 43.7%), and median household income ($87,553 compared to $62,575, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,064 compared to $50,547, a difference of 10.9%), householder income under 25 years ($52,374 compared to $44,356, a difference of 18.1%), and median earnings ($48,041 compared to $38,949, a difference of 23.3%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Houma Income
Income MetricImmigrants from UgandaHouma
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,043
Tragic
$32,996
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,188
Tragic
$76,188
Median Household Income
Excellent
$87,553
Tragic
$62,575
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,041
Tragic
$38,949
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,064
Tragic
$50,547
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,739
Tragic
$30,343
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,374
Tragic
$44,356
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$95,698
Tragic
$77,044
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,584
Tragic
$72,093
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,976
Tragic
$44,822
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
24.9%
Tragic
38.7%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Houma Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.6% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 86.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 68.3%), and single female poverty (20.3% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 66.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 22.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 25.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 27.5%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Houma Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from UgandaHouma
Poverty
Poor
12.8%
Tragic
18.4%
Families
Average
9.1%
Tragic
14.6%
Males
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
16.7%
Females
Fair
13.7%
Tragic
20.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.8%
Tragic
26.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.5%
Tragic
22.7%
Children Under 5 years
Fair
17.7%
Tragic
22.7%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.8%
Tragic
24.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Fair
17.0%
Tragic
26.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
16.8%
Tragic
21.5%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Tragic
23.5%
Single Females
Excellent
20.3%
Tragic
33.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
26.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.3%
Tragic
43.5%
Married Couples
Average
5.2%
Tragic
6.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.1%
Tragic
14.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.8%
Tragic
16.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Average
11.9%
Tragic
16.5%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Houma Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 66.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 37.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.77%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 13.8%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Houma Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from UgandaHouma
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
6.7%
Males
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
7.1%
Females
Average
5.3%
Tragic
6.4%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
21.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Average
4.7%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Excellent
7.4%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
12.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.8%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Houma Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.5% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 13.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 13.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 6.7%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Houma Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from UgandaHouma
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.5%
Tragic
59.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.7%
Tragic
72.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.2%
Poor
35.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.0%
Tragic
73.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.0%
Tragic
81.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.7%
Tragic
74.1%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Houma Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 52.6%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 22.6%), and single mother households (6.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.6% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 0.040%), currently married (45.0% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.7%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Houma Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from UgandaHouma
Family Households
Tragic
62.7%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.6%
Tragic
44.6%
Average Family Size
Good
3.23
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Poor
6.6%
Tragic
7.9%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.0%
Tragic
45.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
13.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.5%
Tragic
46.6%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Houma Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 20.6%), no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 14.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 0.99%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 14.4%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Houma Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from UgandaHouma
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.0%
Tragic
11.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.1%
Tragic
88.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
55.0%
Poor
54.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.4%
Tragic
16.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
4.9%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Houma Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Houma communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 131.0%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 127.6%), and master's degree (16.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 110.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.7% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.55%), 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.59%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.60%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Houma Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from UgandaHouma
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.8%
Nursery School
Poor
97.9%
Tragic
97.3%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Tragic
97.3%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Tragic
97.2%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Tragic
97.2%
3rd Grade
Fair
97.7%
Tragic
97.1%
4th Grade
Poor
97.4%
Tragic
96.8%
5th Grade
Fair
97.2%
Tragic
96.6%
6th Grade
Fair
96.9%
Tragic
96.2%
7th Grade
Fair
96.0%
Tragic
95.1%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Tragic
94.2%
9th Grade
Average
94.8%
Tragic
92.3%
10th Grade
Fair
93.5%
Tragic
90.2%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Tragic
87.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
90.9%
Tragic
83.7%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.9%
Tragic
81.5%
GED/Equivalency
Average
85.7%
Tragic
75.0%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.5%
Tragic
47.6%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.9%
Tragic
41.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
28.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.7%
Tragic
21.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
7.9%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
2.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
0.96%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Houma Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 66.9%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 65.0%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 64.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 6.3%), disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 20.0%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 30.9%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Houma Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from UgandaHouma
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
17.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
17.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
16.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.9%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
9.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
9.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.2%
Tragic
18.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.8%
Tragic
32.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Excellent
46.8%
Tragic
56.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
3.4%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
9.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
3.0%