Norwegian vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,027,756 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Norwegian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.883. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Norwegians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.039% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Norwegians corresponds to an increase of 39.0 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,682 compared to $72,093, a difference of 43.8%), median family income ($106,144 compared to $76,188, a difference of 39.3%), and median household income ($86,084 compared to $62,575, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,965 compared to $50,547, a difference of 10.7%), householder income under 25 years ($53,127 compared to $44,356, a difference of 19.8%), and median earnings ($46,865 compared to $38,949, a difference of 20.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (6.9% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 112.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.2% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 98.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.0% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 91.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 26.3%), single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 53.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.6% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 55.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 96.2%), male unemployment (4.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 60.3%), and unemployment (4.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 59.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 7.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.2% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 29.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.4% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 13.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.3% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 58.7%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 45.1%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.9%), average family size (3.08 compared to 3.18, a difference of 3.2%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 78.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 62.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 48.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.7% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 5.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.8% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 15.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 48.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 106.7%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 91.9%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 89.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.7% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.5%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 68.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 63.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 59.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 11.4%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 14.7%), and cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 16.7%).