French Canadian vs Houma Community Comparison
COMPARE
French Canadian
Houma
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
French Canadians
Houma
5,542
SOCIAL INDEX
52.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
175th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Houma Integration in French Canadian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,587,638 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.521. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.246% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to an increase of 246.3 Houma.
French Canadian vs Houma Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 37.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,093 compared to $72,093, a difference of 37.4%), and median family income ($101,634 compared to $76,188, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($54,722 compared to $50,547, a difference of 8.3%), median earnings ($46,026 compared to $38,949, a difference of 18.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $44,356, a difference of 18.8%).
Income Metric | French Canadian | Houma |
Per Capita Income | Fair $43,003 | Tragic $32,996 |
Median Family Income | Fair $101,634 | Tragic $76,188 |
Median Household Income | Poor $82,810 | Tragic $62,575 |
Median Earnings | Fair $46,026 | Tragic $38,949 |
Median Male Earnings | Average $54,722 | Tragic $50,547 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,436 | Tragic $30,343 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,672 | Tragic $44,356 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Fair $93,694 | Tragic $77,044 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Fair $99,093 | Tragic $72,093 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $57,975 | Tragic $44,822 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.1% | Tragic 38.7% |
French Canadian vs Houma Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 79.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.9% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 65.0%), and single male poverty (14.6% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 60.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (17.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 28.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 31.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 33.4%).
Poverty Metric | French Canadian | Houma |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 18.4% |
Families | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 14.6% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 20.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Good 19.9% | Tragic 26.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 22.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Fair 17.7% | Tragic 22.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Good 15.6% | Tragic 24.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Good 15.9% | Tragic 26.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Good 16.1% | Tragic 21.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 23.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.2% | Tragic 33.8% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.6% | Tragic 26.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.8% | Tragic 43.5% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 6.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 14.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 16.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Good 11.4% | Tragic 16.5% |
French Canadian vs Houma Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 62.5%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 38.4%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 11.9%).
Unemployment Metric | French Canadian | Houma |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.7% |
Males | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 7.1% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Tragic 21.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Good 10.2% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 8.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Poor 4.8% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Excellent 4.8% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 11.2% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.4% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.3% | Tragic 12.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 6.8% |
French Canadian vs Houma Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 22.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 11.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 6.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | French Canadian | Houma |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.0% | Tragic 59.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 79.2% | Tragic 72.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.6% | Poor 35.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 78.1% | Tragic 73.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.2% | Tragic 81.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Good 84.8% | Tragic 79.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Average 84.3% | Tragic 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Poor 82.5% | Tragic 74.1% |
French Canadian vs Houma Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 35.3%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 31.2%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 3.2%), average family size (3.07 compared to 3.18, a difference of 3.4%), and currently married (48.0% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 5.4%).
Family Structure Metric | French Canadian | Houma |
Family Households | Tragic 63.7% | Exceptional 65.7% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.1% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.5% | Tragic 44.6% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.07 | Tragic 3.18 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 7.9% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.0% | Tragic 45.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 13.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 46.6% |
French Canadian vs Houma Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 46.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 34.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 8.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 28.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | French Canadian | Houma |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 11.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 88.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.9% | Poor 54.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.6% | Tragic 16.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 6.6% | Tragic 4.9% |
French Canadian vs Houma Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 86.0%), no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 85.7%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 81.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.3%), 3rd grade (98.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.3%).
Education Level Metric | French Canadian | Houma |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Tragic 2.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Tragic 95.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.2% | Tragic 94.2% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Tragic 92.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.3% | Tragic 90.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.0% | Tragic 87.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Tragic 83.7% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Tragic 81.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.9% | Tragic 75.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 64.2% | Tragic 47.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Poor 57.8% | Tragic 41.2% |
Associate's Degree | Poor 44.9% | Tragic 28.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 35.6% | Tragic 21.4% |
Master's Degree | Poor 14.1% | Tragic 7.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 4.0% | Tragic 2.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Tragic 0.96% |
French Canadian vs Houma Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 51.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 44.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 39.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 0.62%), hearing disability (3.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 11.1%), and cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 12.9%).
Disability Metric | French Canadian | Houma |
Disability | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 17.1% |
Males | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 17.4% |
Females | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 16.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.7% | Tragic 9.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.1% | Tragic 9.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 18.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.7% | Tragic 32.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Good 47.0% | Tragic 56.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 3.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.8% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Excellent 17.1% | Tragic 19.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.7% | Tragic 9.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 3.0% |