Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 27,902,510 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Houma within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.086. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to a decrease of 8.8 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Houma communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 52.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,992 compared to $72,093, a difference of 45.6%), and per capita income ($47,394 compared to $32,996, a difference of 43.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($57,352 compared to $50,547, a difference of 13.5%), householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $44,356, a difference of 17.0%), and median earnings ($48,913 compared to $38,949, a difference of 25.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.6% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 86.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 80.6%), and family poverty (8.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 78.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 32.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 38.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 40.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 81.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 55.4%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.96%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 12.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 53.5%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 30.2%), and single mother households (6.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.36%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and currently married (46.7% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 23.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 18.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 16.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 137.8%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 128.1%), and master's degree (17.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 120.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.0% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.86%), 2nd grade (98.1% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.91%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 75.5%), ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 65.4%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 64.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 9.9%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 19.0%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 32.7%).