Puget Sound Salish vs Houma Community Comparison

COMPARE

Puget Sound Salish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Houma
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Puget Sound Salish

Houma

Average
Tragic
5,672
SOCIAL INDEX
54.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
172nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Houma Integration in Puget Sound Salish Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,193,418 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Puget Sound Salish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.043% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Puget Sound Salish corresponds to an increase of 43.0 Houma.
Puget Sound Salish Integration in Houma Communities

Puget Sound Salish vs Houma Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Houma communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 52.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,340 compared to $72,093, a difference of 36.4%), and median household income ($84,011 compared to $62,575, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($53,704 compared to $50,547, a difference of 6.2%), median earnings ($46,333 compared to $38,949, a difference of 19.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,661 compared to $77,044, a difference of 21.6%).
Puget Sound Salish vs Houma Income
Income MetricPuget Sound SalishHouma
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,495
Tragic
$32,996
Median Family Income
Tragic
$97,958
Tragic
$76,188
Median Household Income
Fair
$84,011
Tragic
$62,575
Median Earnings
Average
$46,333
Tragic
$38,949
Median Male Earnings
Fair
$53,704
Tragic
$50,547
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,376
Tragic
$30,343
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,543
Tragic
$44,356
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$93,661
Tragic
$77,044
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$98,340
Tragic
$72,093
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Fair
$59,934
Tragic
$44,822
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.3%
Tragic
38.7%

Puget Sound Salish vs Houma Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.8% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 83.7%), single father poverty (15.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 76.4%), and family poverty (8.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 74.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 25.5%), married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 30.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 39.2%).
Puget Sound Salish vs Houma Poverty
Poverty MetricPuget Sound SalishHouma
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
18.4%
Families
Excellent
8.4%
Tragic
14.6%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Tragic
16.7%
Females
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
20.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.0%
Tragic
26.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
22.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
22.7%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Tragic
24.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
15.8%
Tragic
26.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
21.5%
Single Males
Average
12.8%
Tragic
23.5%
Single Females
Good
20.6%
Tragic
33.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
26.7%
Single Mothers
Average
29.1%
Tragic
43.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
14.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
16.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
16.5%

Puget Sound Salish vs Houma Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 69.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 66.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 9.3%).
Puget Sound Salish vs Houma Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPuget Sound SalishHouma
Unemployment
Average
5.2%
Tragic
6.7%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
7.1%
Females
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.7%
Tragic
21.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.9%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.7%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.5%
Tragic
12.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.8%

Puget Sound Salish vs Houma Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 10.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 9.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.5% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.1% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 4.3%).
Puget Sound Salish vs Houma Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPuget Sound SalishHouma
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.7%
Tragic
59.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.2%
Tragic
72.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.1%
Poor
35.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.0%
Tragic
73.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.5%
Tragic
81.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.1%
Tragic
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.7%
Tragic
74.1%

Puget Sound Salish vs Houma Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 53.0%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 26.8%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.17%), average family size (3.17 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.28%), and divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 1.8%).
Puget Sound Salish vs Houma Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPuget Sound SalishHouma
Family Households
Exceptional
65.6%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.4%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.4%
Tragic
44.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.17
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.3%
Tragic
7.9%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.6%
Tragic
45.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
13.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.4%
Tragic
46.6%

Puget Sound Salish vs Houma Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 91.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 64.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 14.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 20.3%).
Puget Sound Salish vs Houma Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPuget Sound SalishHouma
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
11.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.5%
Tragic
88.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
62.1%
Poor
54.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
26.4%
Tragic
16.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
4.9%

Puget Sound Salish vs Houma Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Houma communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 55.1%), associate's degree (40.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 43.7%), and bachelor's degree (30.7% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.96%), 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.0%).
Puget Sound Salish vs Houma Education Level
Education Level MetricPuget Sound SalishHouma
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
96.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Tragic
96.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Tragic
95.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
94.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Tragic
92.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Tragic
90.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Tragic
87.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Tragic
83.7%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.9%
Tragic
81.5%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Tragic
75.0%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
63.9%
Tragic
47.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.9%
Tragic
41.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.5%
Tragic
28.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.7%
Tragic
21.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.1%
Tragic
7.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.2%
Tragic
0.96%

Puget Sound Salish vs Houma Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.97% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 92.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 48.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.3% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 40.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 5.8%), hearing disability (3.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 7.2%), and cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 9.9%).
Puget Sound Salish vs Houma Disability
Disability MetricPuget Sound SalishHouma
Disability
Tragic
13.7%
Tragic
17.1%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
17.4%
Females
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
16.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.97%
Tragic
1.9%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
9.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
9.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
18.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.2%
Tragic
32.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.8%
Tragic
56.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
3.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.9%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Poor
17.5%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
9.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
3.0%