Soviet Union vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,333,295 people shows a perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Houma within Soviet Union communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Soviet Union within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.612% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Soviet Union corresponds to a decrease of 612.4 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Houma communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,202 compared to $32,996, a difference of 64.3%), wage/income gap (24.2% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 59.6%), and median family income ($119,262 compared to $76,188, a difference of 56.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,340 compared to $44,356, a difference of 24.8%), median male earnings ($63,382 compared to $50,547, a difference of 25.4%), and median earnings ($54,290 compared to $38,949, a difference of 39.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.5% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 104.5%), single father poverty (14.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 87.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 87.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 12.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 17.3%), and married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 30.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 75.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 62.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.0%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 7.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 13.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 12.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.3% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 77.0%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 62.7%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 54.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.6% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 0.010%), currently married (46.2% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Houma communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 52.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (45.7% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 19.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (82.7% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 7.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 196.2%), master's degree (20.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 159.4%), and doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 158.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.8% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.72%), 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.76%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 102.1%), disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 97.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 82.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 16.6%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 19.3%), and disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 21.6%).