Turkish vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,649,846 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Turkish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.883. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Turks within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.599% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Turks corresponds to an increase of 599.0 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Turkish and Houma communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,814 compared to $72,093, a difference of 63.4%), median family income ($121,202 compared to $76,188, a difference of 59.1%), and median household income ($99,389 compared to $62,575, a difference of 58.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,266 compared to $44,356, a difference of 22.3%), median male earnings ($64,253 compared to $50,547, a difference of 27.1%), and median earnings ($53,919 compared to $38,949, a difference of 38.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Turkish and Houma communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 99.4%), family poverty (7.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 94.7%), and single male poverty (12.1% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 93.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 34.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 39.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 47.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Turkish and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 83.3%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 43.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Turkish and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 13.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 11.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 0.38%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 0.59%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Turkish and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 69.6%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 47.8%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.44%), family households (63.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 3.3%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 18.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 14.8%), and no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 0.23%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Turkish and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 180.0%), doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 178.3%), and master's degree (19.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 151.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.95%), 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.98%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 93.7%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 80.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 77.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 13.8%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 23.0%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 33.1%).